No, Tinder’s Pricing Is Not Ageist. It Really Is Capitalist

No, Tinder’s Pricing Is Not Ageist. It Really Is Capitalist

To revist this informative article, see My Profile, then View stored tales.

Oivind Hovland Getty Images

To revist this short article, check out My Profile, then View conserved tales.

Tinder, everyone’s favorite dating internet site punchline, recently rolled away an innovative new premium solution in order to monetize its massive individual base.

Considering that the introduction of Tinder Plus, numerous have actually reported concerning the company’s choice to charge older users more cash for the newest “premium” service. In order that means the app’s pricing model is ageist, right?

Jeff Gibbard is a 34-year-old solitary guy whom utilizes Tinder, OKCupid, Hinge, Bumble and Wyldfire. He tried Match.com but did not want it. Gibbard is Founder and President of real Voice Media, The Social company Agency, headquartered in Philadelphia, PA.

This is simply not discrimination centered on age; it is cost discrimination centered on age. Plus in the context of this capitalistic country we’re staying in, this can be in no way the instance that is worst of cost discrimination, nor the essential worth y our attention and anger.

From my viewpoint, Tinder’s brand brand new policy is maybe not ageist, it is simply extremely stupid.

I reside in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, perhaps the birthplace for this country that is great. We live in the same country, with the same capitalist DNA whether you are here, or Silicon Valley, or middle America.

Read More